Hungary’s government, people and football team are undergoing an organized lynching process, being brutally attacked through diplomatic channels by members of the European Union and through football federations in the Euro Cup.
The reason is to have passed a law that prohibits the broadcast of material that exposes children to sexual content, gender ideology, sex change and homosexuality.
The pressure began within Hungary itself through five NGOs, including Budapest Pride and mainly Amnesty International, a supra-national organization that defends revolutionary agendas, putting at risk several rights that would be at risk with the approval of the law, according to their “ complaints” below:
Freedom of expression and the rights of LGBTQ children would also be severely restricted”
This change endangers the mental health of LGBT+ youth and prevents them from accessing information and affirmative support in a preventive and timely manner.”
This legislation only reinforces prejudice and homophobia, which is incompatible with the values of democratic societies”
We are witnessing a process of deep persecution and an attempt to overthrow the national sovereignty of the Hungarian people.
Thirteen European Union countries have issued a joint statement pointing the finger at Orban for the law against “gay propaganda”. Part of the document claims that the Hungarian government is passing “amendments that discriminate against LGBTI+ people and violate the right to freedom of expression under the pretext of protecting children”.
- Daniel Negreanu Finally Breaks His Losing Streak to Win Big in Super High Roller Bowl
- Baby Died After Her Mother Left Her On A Trip For Six Days
- OUTSPOKEN: Why Brazil Is The Most Important Country Right Now? By Will Lisil
- How To Build My Artistic Identity In The Metaverse?
- The Spike Protein From Covid Vaccine Can Persist In The Body For Months, Causing Debilitating Symptoms, According To A Study
The joint statement was promoted at the General Affairs Council by Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg and supported and shared by Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Spain, Sweden and Italy.
The case led to such a furor for the promoters of the revolutionary agendas that Munich politicians tried to get the Allianz Arena lit up in the colors of the LGBT political agenda, an idea that was rejected by UEFA.
Players from the teams that will face the Hungarian national team promise to “pass the car” and impose sporting defeats on the Hungarians by rematch.
The Portuguese Football Federation, for example, posted on its social networks an image where we see the sacred Cross of Christ being applied to the propaganda banner of the LGBT political agenda.
What does the law say?
The main arguments presented by NGOs and organizations that promote public opinion do not have solid support in reality or in the bill itself. The law does not at any time restrict families from seeking, if they so wish, any type of support or even professional guidance for their children or guardians.
The law also does not impose at any time any type of restrictive or even social measure on any person because of their sexual orientation.
Freedom of expression is in no way limited to what is stated in the law, as falsely stated by Amnesty International. However, the exposure of children to content that refers to sexuality in general is prohibited, whether introductory in character to masturbation, heterosexual, homosexual or gender ideology in environments not controlled by the family: Propagated by television programs, schools, social campaigns and others.
For the purposes of this Law and for the protection of children, pornographic content and content that promotes sexuality for its own purposes that describe sexuality for sexual purposes, or that deviate from the self-identity of the sex of birth, gender to sex change and homosexuality.”
The law stipulates that such events or materials must contain indicative material for persons over 18 years of age:
An adequate program for physical, mental or moral development, in particular when it constitutes a determinant element of violence, deviations from gender identity, sex change and homosexuality, or the promotion, representation or direct, natural or self-representation. sexuality service, should be classified in category V. Such program: not recommended for children under eighteen years old.”
Still within the law, we have the following excerpt that overturns the fallacy raised by several countries, football federations and sportsmen regarding any type of limitation to information or sex education:
Students must be informed about sexual culture, sexual life, sexual orientation and sexual orientation and sexual development, special attention must be paid to the following Article XVI(1) of the Basic Law. These sessions should not be directed at deviating from your birth sex identity, changing your sex, and promoting homosexuality.”
As we can see, what is prohibited is that entities that have access to children’s education use the captive audience to promote agendas that escape the biological educational character of the theme of sexuality, including issues related to issues such as drugs, ideology of gender, homosexuality, sex change and related to families.
The law also requires that school content be previously publicly disclosed on the internet, making its purpose clearly:
“The registration referred to in paragraph (1)
(a) the title of the scheme,
b) The program holder
(ba) in the case of a natural person, the name, contact details or
bb) in the case of an organization, the name, registered office and contact details of the organization,
c) An indication of the type of public education establishment in which the program is intended to be the type of public education institution in which it will be implemented,
d) The date of registration and the name of the public educational establishment in which the registered program must be implemented and the duration of its use in the educational establishment (indicating the academic year).”
The reader who wants to find the document in Hungarian at this link. It is also possible to download the translated version from this link.
In this way, dear reader, it is increasingly clear that we are witnessing a planned show between political entities and revolutionary organizations, linked to media outlets to promote public opinion and stop a law that aims to protect children’s exposure to sexual content of any kind. species and above all, protect them from a nefarious ideology such as gender, and here I want to emphasize the aspect of this term, as it is exclusively an ideology, there is no connection with human biology or with empirical data that refutes the human biological natural order.
Paulo Henrique Araujo